Categories
Newsletters (172)
Service (124)
Community Notices (591)
MSD (6)
Sexual harassment (2)
Funding (32)
Campaigns (62)
Pacific (3)
It's not OK (35)
Disability (3)
Training (557)
White Ribbon (3)
Courts (8)
Job Vacancies (129)
News Media (566)
Legislation (11)
Children (3)
OT Inquiry (3)
Reviews (13)
Events (611)
Projects (4)
Government (191)
COVID-19 (42)
Policy and Legislation (54)
Resources (105)
Pay equity (10)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse (10)
Te Aorerekura (3)
White Ribbon Day (46)
Consultation (13)
Research (139)
White Paper for vulnerable children (30)
Reports (152)
Programmes (69)
Housing (3)
Submissions (133)
Juvenists (23)
Flood and storm relief (4)
Police (16)
Young people (2)
Conference (33)
Joint Venture (9)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care (8)
Library (18)
Network Meeting (9)
Our People (1)
Rainbow community (1)
Education (1)
Lectures and Seminars (2)
Oranga Tamariki (39)
Tags
Archive
2023
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
Risk assessment in the context of intimate partner violence – Theory to Practice
MSD's FVSV Update September 2023
Henderson Heroes
ACC - Integrated Services for Sensitive Claims: Information sessions for contract updates
Te Puaruruhau - Sexual Harm Conference October 2023 – Auckland
Safeguarding Children training - Child Protection Leads – Online
Weekly Media Roundup
Lifewise Parenting Courses for Term Four 2023
Child Protection in the context of Family Violence - ECLIPSE – Online
Submissions open on bills on family and sexual violence
Job vacancies at Te Kupenga: Whakatinana/Implementation Kaimahi
Weekly Media Roundup
Family Action – new premises, rooms for hire, capacity for referrals
Young People and Pornography/Online Sexual Content workforce training for FV/SV services
Shine RESPOND - Level 3 Specialist: Men Who Use Violence: Drivers, Impacts and Interventions
Deepening reporting practice to prevent violence against women and girls with disabilities
International Youth Day — youth voices, engagement and activism
Sharing Practice – Working with Resistance and Backlash – Webinar
NZFVC: Sexual violence justice updates
Child Protection Training - Auckland Region
Shine RESPOND - Level 3 - Advanced 2-day training – Auckland
Sexual Harm Conference October 2023
Shine RESPOND - Level 1 - Introductory training – Online
Weekly Media Roundup
Bill to make court less traumatic for children and victims of sexual offences
June 17, 2015 at 4:10 PM
*From the NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse*
A Bill which aims to make court processes less traumatic for children and victims of sexual offences was introduced by Justice Minister Amy Adams on 27 May 2015. It had its first reading in Parliament on 2 June 2015.
The Evidence Amendment Bill 2015 makes a number of small changes to the Evidence Act 2006, as recommended by a Law Commission review in 2013. The changes include:
- "admitting previous consistent statements
- privilege for plea discussions
- minor and technical amendments
- restrictions on video record evidence
- notice requirements for evidence of sexual history
- presumption that child witnesses give evidence in alternative ways."
The law currently requires the prosecution to apply to the Judge for directions on how a child witness will give evidence in criminal cases involving children. The Evidence Amendment Bill creates the presumption that children under 18 will give evidence via alternative means, such as pre-recorded video, closed-circuit television (CCTV), or from behind a witness screen in court.
Under the Bill, the Judge, jury and lawyers must be able to see and hear the witness give evidence, and the defendant must be able to see the witness, unless the Judge directs otherwise. Evidence may still be given the ordinary way if the defence successfully applies to the Judge for an order, or the child witness wishes to do so. Although primary evidence is able to be recorded, the child witness may still be cross-examined via CCTV.
The Bill also states no evidence can be given, or question put to a witness, about the sexual experience of the complainant with any other person other than the defendant, except with the permission of the Judge. If the defence seeks to bring evidence about the sexual history of the complainant, they must provide advance written notice allowing all parties fair opportunity to respond to the evidence or question.
The Bill provides that the restrictions on parties to the proceedings cross-examining complainants and child witnesses apply in both criminal and civil proceedings involving domestic violence or harassment (Part 1, Clause 27 amending Section 95 of the Act).
Minister Adams said "When you're talking about sexual violence or family violence, particularly sexual assaults, it is the most intrusive and potentially humiliating process to have to go through to have to repeat some incredibly personal and invasive information to a whole range of strangers and be questioned on it. We've got to have a way of holding these people to account and I could never consider a situation where child sex offenders weren't held to account because it was just too difficult to take children to court - so we've got to do this somehow, and we've got to get that balance right."
The changes were first announced by previous Justice Minister Judith Collins in 2013. At the time, Green Party MP Jan Logie welcomed the changes but called them "baby steps", saying there is much more to be done.
The above information is based on the Bill Digest prior to the first reading. See the Parliament website for the departmental disclosure statement, which provides information to support and enhance the Parliamentary and public scrutiny of the Bill.