Categories
Te Aorerekura (3)
Reviews (13)
Joint Venture (9)
White Paper for vulnerable children (30)
Network Meeting (9)
White Ribbon Day (46)
It's not OK (35)
Pay equity (10)
Education (1)
Flood and storm relief (4)
Policy and Legislation (55)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse (10)
Young people (2)
Projects (4)
Research (146)
Housing (3)
Sexual harassment (2)
Resources (108)
Disability (3)
Our People (1)
Conference (33)
Oranga Tamariki (40)
Lectures and Seminars (2)
Newsletters (177)
Legislation (11)
Te Puna Aonui (1)
Rainbow community (1)
Juvenists (23)
Pacific (3)
Police (16)
Submissions (135)
Consultation (13)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care (8)
Campaigns (64)
Library (18)
News Media (576)
Children's Network (2)
MSD (6)
Government (191)
Service (123)
Programmes (70)
Community Notices (596)
Job Vacancies (129)
COVID-19 (42)
Training (575)
White Ribbon (3)
Events (641)
Children (4)
Courts (8)
OT Inquiry (3)
Reports (154)
Tags
Archive
2023
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
NZFVC Weekly Quick Reads: 24 November 2023
Strong Connections: Gender-Based Violence and Mass Casualties
Tāmaki Makaurau Hui: Strengthening Communities
Ethnic Communities Innovation Fund
Mana Mokopuna survey for mokopuna now open
State of Our Communities 2023
Risk Analysis & Safety Strategising. A Whole of Person Approach - Online workshop
NZFVC Weekly Quick Reads: 5 December 2023
Court Support Network Hui - Online workshop
Understanding Sexual Violence in Aotearoa – Tauranga
Safe & Together Model CORE Training - by Tautoko Mai Sexual Harm Support Service
Save the date - Aotearoa National Family Violence Conference - Te Whanganui-a-Tara | Wellington
Weekly Media Roundup
2023 International Day to End Violence Against Women, 16 Days of Activism, White Ribbon Day
NZFVC Weekly Quick Reads: 29 November 2023
Advocacy Activism and Practice Born From Lived Experience of Sexual Assault – Webinar
New research examines structural disadvantage in rangatahi Māori mental wellbeing
Beyond the Shadows – Webinar
Back to Basics: What will it take to prevent sexual and intimate partner violence? – Webinar
The 2021 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS)
Group Work Training with Craig Whisker in 2024
Level 3 - Working with Children Experiencing Family Violence – Auckland
Save the date - 2024 Aotearoa/New Zealand Family Violence Conference
Have your say on rental housing standards
January 21, 2016 at 3:50 PM
You can help New Zealand children live in better quality rental housing!
The New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services (NZCCSS) has teamed up with ActionStation, Unicef, CPAG and Sustainability Trust to create a simple way for you to make a submission on what the minimum housing standards in rental properties should be.
We know the quality of housing plays an important role in children's health and well-being.
We also know many lives, especially those of young children, would be saved if we had decent standards for rental housing in New Zealand.
NZCCSS supports legislation to raise housing standards but believes the standard proposed in the Bill is set too low to make any real difference.
You can make a submission on this Amendment Bill either as an individual or organisation.
Submit on minimum housing standards here.
Submissions are due 27 January 2016
For more information about the Bill go to NZCCSS Posts:
A chance to do more to improve housing,
Rental law changes are half hearted
See also:
Elinor Chisholm: On dampness and progress, or, how research makes a difference
Many homes are damp in New Zealand, but more rental homes than owner-occupied homes are damp. A year ago, a paper by Sarah Bierre, Mark Bennett, and Philippa Howden-Chapman pointed out that our law on residential tenancies requires rental homes to be "free of dampness". And yet, the dampness standard was not mentioned in the Government's guide to renters' rights or in the standard tenancy agreement.
When the researchers reviewed a year's worth of Tenancy Tribunal cases in which dampness was a problem, they found that adjudicators often did not apply the dampness standard, or applied it inconsistently. This was very worrying, as it meant "different tenants and landlords are, respectively, accorded different rights and duties".
The researchers put forward that the dampness standard should be consistently interpreted to require landlords "to address any dampness that results from the state of the house rather than from the actions of the tenants living in the house in a normal way".