Categories


Tags

ElderSexual ViolenceDisabilityCounsellingCoordinationEducationFamilyCrisisParentingChildrenEthnicWomenYouthMaoriLegalMen


Archive

2022

January
February
March
April
May
   Weekly Media Roundup
   Le Va launches new Upstander initiative
   Keeping you updated: COVID-19
   Child protection leads - Safeguarding Children online training
   Supporting Rainbow & Takatāpui Rangatahi and their Whānau
   Network training from ECPAT NZ
   Family Planning Resources Update
   What is the nature and impact of tech facilitated abuse in young people?
   Recognising & responding to grooming - Safeguarding Children online training
   Ministry of Health: Developing a System and Service Framework
   Indigenous perspectives on healing from PTSD - Learning Network (Canada) webinar
   A Conversation about Trans Health and Primary Care - Webinar series
   Weekly Media Roundup
   Budget 2022 funding for family violence and sexual violence
   DVFREE Family Violence Training for Workplace Support People – Auckland
   Child protection in the context of family harm training - ECLIPSE – Online
   Practitioner-Victim Insight Concept (PVIC) - ECLIPSE - Online workshop
   Foundational training for non-specialists - ECLIPSE - Online workshop
   Job Vacancy at Te Whare O Ngā Tūmanako Māori Women’s Refuge: Team Lead
   He Waka Eke Noa - Online Presentation Series - Episode 6 – Webinar
   Shine RESPOND - Level 3 - Advanced 2-day training
   Harmful Digital Communications Act: recent cases, changes and calls for review
   Care in the Community pivots as NZ returns to greater normality
   Oranga Tamariki Pānui
   Weekly Media Roundup

Police vetting cost recovery consultation

February 20, 2013 at 9:46 AM

NZ Police ask the public for opinions on the proposal to seek cost recovery for a variety of Police activities, which are not seen as ‘primary functions’.    This consultation finishes on 5 March 2013 and covers two related matters:

  1. Seeking public comment on the general concept of cost recovery and asking what areas of police activities might be considered appropriate for cost recovery, citing examples from overseas including attending events, providing information, licensing, vehicle removal/disposal, and other such as custody for immigration, attending false alarms, traffic management for business/events.
  2. Seeking specific comment on the proposal to charge all organisations including government agencies $5-7 (GST inclusive) for a standard police check and $10-14 (GST inclusive) for an urgent check.

WAVES Trust does not support the proposal to seek cost recovery for police attendance at non-profit public and community events or for police vetting provided to NGO organisations, charities, and religious organisations. Read more

For more information and links to relevant documents and other organisations submissions see our 'Police Vetting' webpage.



Category: Submissions