YouthEducationLegalEthnicMaoriDisabilityElderMenCounsellingCoordinationWomenChildrenParentingSexual ViolenceFamilyCrisis



   Weekly Media Roundup
   World-leading family harm prevention campaign supports young NZers
   Domestic violence disclosure schemes study: Interviews with applicants
   Job Vacancy at Kindred Family Services: General Counsellor and Child Therapist
   FASD Learning and Networking Group for Social and Support Workers (LANSAS)
   New report on access to services for male survivors of sexual violence
   Child Matters: Auckland Region Child Protection Training
   SWRB Workforce Survey Report 2022
   Child and Youth Wellbeing update: March 2023
   Weekly Media Roundup
   MSD: Family Violence and Sexual Violence Update
   Deadline extended for social work pay equity data collection
   He Waka Eke Noa | Māori Cultural Frameworks for Violence Prevention & Intervention Roadshow
   Regulations published to support tenancy laws for victim/survivors
   ACLC: 2023 Know Your Rights Education Series
   ‘Folau He Vahanoa’ legal education programme – Auckland
   MPHS: Free Whānau Fun Day!
   Oranga Tamariki Evidence Centre Seminar: February 2023
   Traumatic Brain Injury Conference: Across the spectrum of interpersonal violence – Whanganui
   Weekly Media Roundup
   MSD: Family Violence and Sexual Violence Update
   Brainwave Online Conference - Last Chance To Book
   Family violence is making Kiwis sick, research shows
   E Tū Whānau Pānui: Funding and support for communities affected by cyclone and floods
   An ongoing duty to care: Responding to survivors of family violence homicide

Issues paper: Risk assessment: What is it and how can it be applied in family violence?

October 30, 2015 at 9:01 AM

Issues Paper 9, Risk assessment: What is it and how can it be applied in family violence?

The New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse has just released Issues Paper 9, Risk assessment: What is it and how can it be applied in family violence?

This Issues Paper, written by Pauline Gulliver and Janet Fanslow, has these key messages:

  • Risk assessment must be considered as a piece in the wider puzzle of risk management.
  • Adequate services need to be provided for those considered at "less" risk, so they receive an appropriate response. This also reduces the imperative for service providers to escalate a case, in order to get help for a person.
  • Effective risk assessment and management needs to be grounded in an integrated response system. This needs to have:

- Underlying principles which shape how practitioners respond.

- Training for practitioners in the effective conduct of risk assessment and the effective communication of results.

- Appropriate risk assessment tools should be selected, with monitoring to ensure they are used as intended and that they support risk management decision making.

- Clarity of roles and responsibilities for all components of the system.

  • Co-location of professionals for risk management appears very beneficial to facilitate adequate communication. Co-location:

- Enhances the development of a unique culture which supports increased trust and information sharing between professionals from different agencies.

- Facilitates the process of risk management planning by reducing turnaround times and enhancing access to services.

- Where effective colocation is not achievable, clear roles, responsibilities, communication strategies and a common culture around family violence must be developed to ensure a consistent response is provided.

  • Effective communication of risk, using common language, is vital to ensure all professionals understand how an estimation of risk was derived.

- Training is required across government agencies to ensure there is a consistent understanding of family violence - including understanding definitions and patterns of violence. 

- To develop a common language, training should be shared across government agencies, rather than being delivered within agencies.

  • Effective risk management requires a lead agency to take responsibility for the implementation of planned activities. This lead agency also needs to be tasked with the responsibility of regularly reviewing risk in light of developments.

- Agencies need to be aware of each other's roles and responsibilities within the risk management system. 

- Where limitations exist within the family violence risk management system, external resourcing may be required to ensure all risks are effectively addressed.


Read the paper here.

Category: Research