Categories
Job Vacancies (128)
Network Meeting (9)
Submissions (130)
White Paper for vulnerable children (30)
Rainbow community (1)
Te Aorerekura (2)
Projects (4)
Programmes (65)
Research (136)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse (10)
Children's Network (2)
White Ribbon (3)
Policy and Legislation (53)
Flood and storm relief (4)
Reports (146)
Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care (8)
Our People (1)
Housing (3)
OT Inquiry (3)
Sexual harassment (1)
Community Notices (587)
Police (16)
Children (3)
Resources (104)
Courts (8)
Reviews (13)
Library (18)
Service (124)
Events (571)
Newsletters (163)
Pay equity (8)
Young people (1)
Legislation (11)
Consultation (9)
News Media (552)
Training (520)
Juvenists (23)
Conference (33)
MSD (4)
Oranga Tamariki (39)
COVID-19 (42)
White Ribbon Day (46)
Disability (3)
Funding (31)
Lectures and Seminars (2)
Campaigns (61)
Pacific (2)
Education (1)
Government (184)
It's not OK (35)
Tags
Archive
2023
February
March
April
May
The Changemaker Fund
MSD: FVSV Update May 2023 - Budget issue
Budget 2023: Overview from the NZFVC
Domestic abuse perpetrator programs – a view from the UK – Webinar
Cross Agency Rainbow Network Conference 2023 - Ōtautahi | Christchurch and Online
Now We Are 12: Life in early adolescence - Growing Up in NZ webinar series
Foundational training for non-specialists - ECLIPSE – Online
Feedback invited on Oranga Tamariki disability strategy
New Rainbow resources, training, research, Rainbow Family Violence Awareness Day
June/July 2023 professional development from the Grief Centre
Safeguarding & Child Protection blended learning: eLearning + Webinar
Weekly Media Roundup
Budget 2023 builds on progress to eliminate violence
Addressing service gaps in family violence and sexual violence
Te Aorerekura - Ako tahi - 2023 Annual Te Aorerekura Hui - Learning Together - Online
Pink Shirt Day 2023: Workplace toolkit
INZ Webinar for Family Violence Prevention Sector
Deciphering Accounts: Practical guidance on managing accounts for charities
Embedding victims'/survivors' lived expertise in co-production of research etc
Coercive Control Awareness, Practice Guidelines and Tools
RVPN present: Preventing Family Violence against rainbow people: A panel discussion
Government moves to support social workers workforce
Report findings show Whānau Ora model working to change whānau lives
Weekly Media Roundup
Have your say on rental housing standards
January 21, 2016 at 3:50 PM
You can help New Zealand children live in better quality rental housing!
The New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services (NZCCSS) has teamed up with ActionStation, Unicef, CPAG and Sustainability Trust to create a simple way for you to make a submission on what the minimum housing standards in rental properties should be.
We know the quality of housing plays an important role in children's health and well-being.
We also know many lives, especially those of young children, would be saved if we had decent standards for rental housing in New Zealand.
NZCCSS supports legislation to raise housing standards but believes the standard proposed in the Bill is set too low to make any real difference.
You can make a submission on this Amendment Bill either as an individual or organisation.
Submit on minimum housing standards here.
Submissions are due 27 January 2016
For more information about the Bill go to NZCCSS Posts:
A chance to do more to improve housing,
Rental law changes are half hearted
See also:
Elinor Chisholm: On dampness and progress, or, how research makes a difference
Many homes are damp in New Zealand, but more rental homes than owner-occupied homes are damp. A year ago, a paper by Sarah Bierre, Mark Bennett, and Philippa Howden-Chapman pointed out that our law on residential tenancies requires rental homes to be "free of dampness". And yet, the dampness standard was not mentioned in the Government's guide to renters' rights or in the standard tenancy agreement.
When the researchers reviewed a year's worth of Tenancy Tribunal cases in which dampness was a problem, they found that adjudicators often did not apply the dampness standard, or applied it inconsistently. This was very worrying, as it meant "different tenants and landlords are, respectively, accorded different rights and duties".
The researchers put forward that the dampness standard should be consistently interpreted to require landlords "to address any dampness that results from the state of the house rather than from the actions of the tenants living in the house in a normal way".